Nuclear waste other
But the issue of identifying the site only requires that decisions to exclude the Basilicata - It also discusses how to deploy the 'treasure' in the territory
ROTONDELLA . The nuclear controversy. National controversy (yes back to the atom, the atom no return) and local controversies. These are ablaze at the commemoration of the Battle of antiscorie Scanzano Jonico. Thus, political and voluntary Lucan were divided on many issues. The one on how to use the "treasure" by the Prodi government allocated for the City of Rotondella and the Province of Matera in accordance with the infamous decree of November Scanzano 2003 into law. "Peso" for local authorities insist that the former central or former atomic sites. How, exactly, the City and the Province of Matera Rotondella which have been € 2.84 million each. And while turnover is confrontation. Originally, in fact, had to be about 5 million, not 2.8. Even considering the fact that concern the period 2004-2006. But, so be it. The problem now is how to spend this money. For Rotondella we think the City Council to decide. And for the Province? On this question triggers a question to the President of the Region, Vito De Filippo, director of the regional Cosimo Latronico (FI). "It's good-wrote Latronico - establish an understanding with the Province of Matera because 50% of contributions assigned to it are dedicated to the neighboring towns Trisaia most directly affected by the presence of the system of penalties Aeneas, which refer Policoro and Nova Siri. It would also be useful to promote a table between the local recipients of these resources to envisage a joint project to support initiatives that ensure safe and effective impact. " Hence the request of the exponent "blue" to "governor" of Basilicata because they face "a promoter of a framework agreement, which could take part, by funds from the bank, the same region, between the towns of Rotondella, Nova Siri , Policoro, and the Province Matera to define content and methods of use of resources allocated by the CIPE. "The controversy, however, are not only on this piano.Noscorie Trisaia, for example," raises the bar "with regard to the choice of the Prodi government in a site to locate the single deposit of waste. "Noscorie - according to a document - Massimo asks Scudder, former coordinator of the Technical Commission for Nuclear Safety and health protection APAT and now coordinator of the Technical Group of the body appointed by the Minister Pierluigi Bersani for the detection of radioactive waste storage only Italian, to motivate not just the suitability of the Basilicata region to host it. Meanwhile we continue to chiedere la restituzione delle barre di uranio di Elk River agli Usa con la messa in sicurezza delle scorie radioattive presso i centri in cui sono attualmente ubicati, proprio per evitare le “tentazioni” dei ministri Massimo D’Alema e Bersani di far ripartire in Italia il nucleare e i business ad esso collegati».
FONTE: La Gazzetta del Mezzogiorno
0 comments:
Post a Comment